
Cacophonous - Visible Noise
|

|
Meet Julie Weir, manager of Cacophonous Records, the London-based black metal label that gave us Cradle
of Filth (among others). Far from being restricted to one style of music, she created last year a less
"specialized" label, Visible Noise, now home to the highly talented Kill II This. She talks to us openly
about her tastes in music, the attitude of media towards black metal, the "Cradle of Filth case" and
her wishes for the future.
|
|

- When did you start Cacophonous records and why did you choose this particular type of music? -
Cacophonous was started in 1994 specifically to deal with demos from underground bands. The first signing
was Cradle of Filth, but that wasn't a demo, it was actually recorded. We moved on to releasing things
on CD and vinyl because it got such an overwhelming response from people and the quality of the stuff
was so high that we thought it was only fair that we released things like that. I didn't start Cacophonous,
I'm the label manager. It was started a year or so before I took over, by a guy called Nihil (aka Neil
Harding), who's very involved in the black metal scene in England and Germany and has been into that
kind of music for ages. The only thing is that now all the innovation has gone out of black metal and
there are very little other directions that people can move in. We've done vampiric metal, orchestral
metal, we've done everything, but now we're still looking towards extreme music for Cacophonous, but
maybe not necessarily black metal, which you'll see in September/October with the release by a band called
Emnity, which is Paul Ryan's band, who used to be in Cradle/Blood Divine. We've also got a band called
Lilith, who are also part of Cradle/Blood Divine and then Raven Stone, Fifth to infinity, who are a lot
more black metal than the other two, but we are trying to slightly move away from it. - How did you
personally come to that kind of music? - Black metal isn't exactly the thing that I would listen
to first and foremost at home. I mean, I come up through the ranks of the goth-type thing and obviously
I really love a lot of industrial music, but I like a lot of metal stuff, I like all the Machine Head,
Fear Factory types, I like hard metal. I also love Slayer and Pantera, that's the kind of things I really
like. I'm not a big fan of Angra, Stratovarius and all that kind of things. - What were the main
difficulties you encountered for this label? - For Cacophonous? Obviously, we had the problem with
Cradle of Filth a while ago, but I think that has actually been resolved. But because there were problems
with Cradle, they were bad-mouthing us to the other bands they were touring with. That got into a bit
of a complete nightmare, especially when things were completely unfounded. I mean, since then, I think
a lot of people have actually realized that we're not really the bad guys and we didn't really do anything
wrong, it was just a lot of personal misunderstandings. And obviously, Nihil, when he signed Cradle was
actually a really good friend of them. So when personal life comes into that kind of business, it just
gets very complicated and then there was a falling out and things just got nasty. But it was more to
do with the personal end of things than business. I mean, it was all the stuff in the press about us
never having paid them, etc., but we have the actual bank transfers to prove that we have done it and
their management has copies of these. I personally don't have any problem with Cradle themselves, but
that was the biggest problem that we've encountered with Cacophonous, especially when it started going
off on Dimmu Borgir and they were saying that they had left the label, when it wasn't true, they were
only signed for one album. But the labels are always the bad guys and it's the way it'll always remain.
Nobody ever wants to listen to what we say. - I'd also like to know about other kinds of difficulties,
with the media, the press, etc. - Since Cacophonous is mainly an underground label (underground
in ethics, not necessarily size and business sense anymore), the kind of music we deal with is obviously
a minority style, so trying to get that on television or anything is very very hard. And when they seem
to be interested, they just want to look at the sensational side, like the church burnings, etc. When
things get out of hand, it just turns into a freak show, instead of looking at the metal and the aesthetics
of it all, they make it look like a bad tabloid report. Radios are quite easy for us actually because
there are so many good underground radio stations worldwide, including England, surprisingly, and press
isn't really a problem because we get on very well with the metal press. But I would say it's different
for the mainstream press, people like the NME, Melody Maker... Cradle of Filth had a small relationship
with them a while ago, but again it seemed to be like the lampoon thing, how many times can a band swear
in an interview, you know, that type of things. It gets really boring after a while and people just treat
you as a joke and it's not. I know that maybe some people do set themselves up to be ridiculed, but at
least you can look a bit deeper than what people look like. - Do you usually get lots of censorship
problems, like the Cradle of Filth T-shirts? - We had a lot of problems with the vampire poster campaign,
because it was a topless woman. Personally, I think you see it on page 3 of the Sun every morning, why
does it make a difference if it's on a wall? Anybody can go into a shop and buy a newspaper or something
like that. Imagewise, I do tend to try and steer away from seriously conflicting images. If you look
at our covers, a lot of it is more esoteric than conflicting really. I think Marduk and bands like that
are a bit more confrontational. Personally, I don't have a problem with the images, but I'm trying to
get things in the shops and try to sell things and if shops aren't going to take the CDs and the merchandise
because of an image that people find offensive or whatever, it's not going to make the band any money.
It will get them a lot of publicity and it will somehow let a point and I'd like to do it, but it just
doesn't really make a lot of sense at the moment. Publicitywise yes, but moneywise no, unfortunately.
- What are your greatest joys and disappointments about this label? - I really love my job and not
many people can say that. I'm my own boss, I get to do what I do. The only thing that maybe I don't like
sometimes is my working hours, because I really work a lot (nights as well), so you do get very tired.
And it isn't as glamorous as anybody thinks. I mean, you see our office (little premises in Portobello),
we're not like a big record company. If bands are in the country, I offer them to stay with me, so I
never get any time to myself, that's probably the worst bit. But I can live with that. - Last year,
you created another label, Visible Noise, could you tell us about it? - Visible Noise was started
because I don't actually listen to black metal at home and I thought it was maybe time for a departure,
because we have enough contacts and enough people that we can deal with that would make the starting
of another label very easy. There's only as yet one band on it because the quality of bands at the moment
is really problematic. I set it up initially because I want to give smaller bands a chance. At the moment,
it's really UK bands, because everybody seems to be signing American bands, I have friends here on labels
and they're dealing with America at the moment, Earache for starters. I saw Kill II This supporting Megadeth
quite some time ago, then I received a demo of them and they're really fantastic, they're really lovely
people, very enthusiastic, they'll tour at the drop of a hat. The label was set up to give people a chance
to get their stuff out and with people like that, I'd never want to get back and say I don't want it
to exist anymore, because they're so enthusiastic and there are a couple of other bands now, maybe not
quite in the league of Kill II This, but they're gonna do very well as well. It's going to be more in
the line of things like Fear Factory, Machine Head, that's the type of thing I listen to personally,
so that's what I really want to do. Someting that's maybe a little fresher than black metal now, because
black metal has been around for so many years. Kill II This have been going on for a long time, this
is actually their second album, but the first album "Another cross to bear" didn't really do very well
because it wasn't promoted properly and they didn't have the budgets to go touring, they paid for it
all themselves. So essentially, I'm just giving them a chance to prove themselves and they've done it.
They're doing very well, I think they have a lot more stuff ahead of them... fingers crossed. - Do
you consider the underground side of black metal a good or a bad thing? - I think the underground
side is fantastic, it's where everybody has come through. Without the underground, black metal wouldn't
exist to start with. I mean , it's like going back to the problem question you asked me before, with
the bands kicking off and saying we haven't done this or that, we were the first people to deal with
Cradle and Dimmu Borgir. And what they forget is that if we hadn't signed them all those years ago and
hadn't given them a chance, they wouldn't exist. And I mean, obviously we're the bad guys, but without
us, they wouldn't be where they are now. Maybe I'm blowing my own trumpet a bit there, but it is true,
because at the time, nobody was interested in black metal, nobody was touching it. - I mean, when
bands start to get known, they sometimes make mediocre records... - Yes, that's a problem, because
everybody believes that Cradle and Dimmu Borgir have completely sold out. But I don't think you can say
that really, because everybody exists essentially to make money for their jobs and things like that and
if people say they're just doing it for the love of it, it's a complete lie. All bands want to make money,
they just want to be rich. Otherwise, they wouldn't be doing what they are doing. So just because Cradle
of Filth and Dimmu Borgir have got all the money behind them now, I don't think they've sold out, they
just look a bit better, they've got stylists working on them, they've got huge advertising campaigns
going. The new Dimmu Borgir album is fantastic, I'm not too keen on "Cruelty and the Beast", I like them,
I just don't like "Cruelty". But I think maybe it's a little bit of bitterness from the underground bands,
I shouldn't really be saying this actually, because lots of people have accused us of selling out and
said that we're not an underground label anymore. But what can you do? We've got a back catalogue of
thirty-odd titles, we have more money now because the company is doing well, is that selling out or
is that just trying to promote what you want to do? It's a very difficult argument. I mean, personally,
I love the underground, because whenever I go abroad to gigs, it's so nice that everybody knows each
other, wherever they are in Europe, I think it's brilliant. You don't get that in any other genre of
music, it's really tightly knit. But obviously, the tight-knitness causes problems as well, because people
back-stab and fall out, etc. But it was the same with the goth scene when I was a kid really. I think
the underground would accuse us of selling out now. Especially when we release the new albums that are
coming out in the second half of this year, because we are departing a little bit from black metal, that
will be the last straw of it all. But I think things have to move on, you can't just go on making black
metal for 15 years. The whole genre is becoming more dilute now, because, as I've said, there's no other
direction that people can move in. Things will change, it might be a cyclical thing, where it will go
through black metal, through hardcore, through traditional metal, I don't know. Things have to change,
it has to be on a continuum really. - How do you see the labels tomorrow? - I would say that
Cacophonous would expand more in terms of genres, but I don't want anybody to think that we're not going
to do extreme music, we might do different forms of it, but it still will be extreme music. We're going
to be doing more hardcore stuff and industrial, because, as I've said, I really like industrial stuff.
For Visible Noise, I would just hope that I could get another 5 or 6 good bands, but the search for them
at the moment is just so difficult. As I've said, I've concentrated on mainly UK bands and maybe that
is a problem because a lot of bands start out now very young and they're really cocky and think they're
just brilliant. It just doesn't work like that, I'm for the enthusiasm, but practice makes perfect. For
Visible Noise, I want more bands and for Cacophonous, just a more varied set of genres in the extreme
music field. Interview by Jean-Paul Coillard and Marie Lecocq
|



|